DevOps with AI and LLMOps: from pipeline to model that speaks

Informatec Digital » Resources » DevOps with AI and LLMOps: from pipeline to model that speaks

The arrival of generative AI and large language models has completely changed the way software is built, deployed, and operated. Having good things is no longer enough. DevOps pipelines nor by applying classic MLOpsWhen you introduce an LLM into the equation, you enter a realm where the model speaks, reasons, improvises, and sometimes behaves in unpredictable ways.

In this new scenario, Teams need to combine DevOps, AI, and LLMOps to govern the entire lifecycle of LLM-based applications.From experimentation and prompt engineering to deployment, monitoring, security, and cost optimization, this article brings all that noise down to earth and walks you through, step by step, how to fit ChatOps, DevOps, MLOps, GenAIOps, and LLMOps into a modern operation.

From DevOps and MLOps to LLMOps: why the model is no longer static

For years, the priority of the engineering teams was automate software delivery and reduce friction between development and infrastructureThus DevOps was born: continuous integration, continuous deployment, infrastructure as code, observability, and a collaborative culture that eliminated endless handoffs between departments.

When the data became part of the product, it emerged MLOps as a response to the need for reproducibility and traceability of machine learning modelsPractices such as dataset versioning, training pipeline orchestration, drift detection, and continuous evaluation of predictive models were standardized.

The problem is that LLMs break many of the assumptions implicit in DevOps and MLOpsThey are not static APIs or simple functions that return a deterministic number: they respond in natural language, mix context, instructions, tools and data in real time, and can produce two different outputs for the same input.

This implies that It is not enough to simply change the model and its weightsIt is also necessary to control the prompts, templates, semantic security policies, restrictions, connected tools, the injected context, and even the business rules that condition the system's behavior.

What is LLMOps and what does it actually solve?

We can see LLMOps as the operational framework that allows for the secure, controlled, and sustainable deployment, maintenance, and scaling of LLM-based applicationsIt is an umbrella under which DevOps practices, MLOps, and new capabilities specific to generative models coexist.

In essence LLMOps focuses less on “training the perfect model” and more on governing its behavior in production.It includes how prompt flows are designed and versioned, how LLMs are connected to internal data sources, how token costs and latency are monitored, and how semantic risk is managed (hallucinations, information leaks, biases, toxic responses, etc.).

The needs that LLMOps addresses, and that DevOps/MLOps alone do not cover, include aspects as varied as conversation traceability, automatic evaluation of response quality, or A/B comparison of behavioral variantsWe're not just talking about classic accuracy, but also consistency, alignment with the business, and security.

Furthermore, Costs are no longer limited to training and hosting the modelEach prompt, each extended context, and each concurrent call triggers GPU or token consumption in commercial APIs. Without an LLMOps layer to make this consumption visible and connect it to equipment, services, and use cases, the bill grows unpredictably.

ChatOps + LLMOps + DevOps: operations become conversational

One of the most powerful trends is the integration of ChatOps and LLMOps within the DevOps cultureInstead of being limited to dashboards, scripts, and pipelines, teams are starting to operate a large part of the system from chat channels like Slack, Microsoft Teams, or Discord.

ChatOps proposes that daily operations (deployments, log queries, reboots, configuration changes) are executed by bots within the communication channel itself, transparently to the entire team. Every command, action, and result is recorded in the conversation.

When an LLM is added to that approach, a new layer of intelligence emerges: Chatbots that understand natural language, interpret intentions, and can execute complex commands or analyze situations without the operator needing to remember every exact script or flag.

Typical examples of this convergence include that a bot, powered by an LLM, reads Prometheus metrics and Loki logs When someone writes "the service of group X is slow" and suggests actions such as escalating replicas, doing a rollback, or launching specific tests, all explained in natural language.

At a cultural and operational level, this translates into Faster decisions, less manual intervention in repetitive tasks, and a smoother experience for DevOps teams, who go from constantly putting out fires to working on strategic improvements.

Key principles of an LLM lifecycle in production

Running a serious LLM is not a one-off project, it's a cycle that repeats itself and in which each change can alter the behavior of the systemAlthough each organization adapts it to its own reality, there are usually six major stages that feed back into each other.

The first is the training or adaptation phase of the modelThis can range from using a foundational model as is to applying fine-tuning, LoRa, or other tuning techniques with your own data. The important thing here is not just performance, but leaving a complete record: datasets, applied filters, hyperparameters, tokenizer versions, tested architectures, etc.

If this phase is improvised and not documented, the model is born without governanceAfterwards, it will be almost impossible to explain why it responds the way it does or to repeat a specific result when needed in an audit.

The second stage is deployment, where the model leaves the lab and enters production. At LLMOps, this isn't just about "putting it in a container": We have to decide what hardware to useHow to manage memory for long-running contexts, which cluster topology to apply, and how to scale based on traffic without latency skyrocketing or costs becoming unaffordable.

That's where things come into play continuous behavior-oriented monitoringIt is not enough to look at CPU and RAM; it is necessary to monitor the semantic quality of the responses, the stability of the style, the error rate, the evolution of the cost per token, the appearance of dangerous or incoherent responses and the changes in response times under different usage patterns.

In later phases, optimization and fine-tuning tasks are carried out: touch prompts, adjust the RAG, test model variants, quantize, do A/B testing, change semantic security policies, or refine business rulesIt's an almost artisanal process, where data, engineering, and business sit down together to decide what to prioritize.

Finally, all of this falls within layers of security and governance (access control, auditing, leak prevention, usage limits, regulatory compliance) and in a logic of continuous updating, where the model and its ecosystem are adapted to changes in data, regulations and internal needs.

GenAIOps and the notification flow approach in Azure

Within the LLMOps universe, there are very specific proposals for structuring this life cycle. One of the most advanced in the corporate environment is GenAIOps with prompt flow on Azure Machine Learning integrated with Azure DevOps, which proposes a very systematic approach to building LLM-based applications.

The prompt flow is not just a prompt editor; it's a complete platform for designing, testing, versioning, and deploying LLM interaction flows, from simple cases (a single prompt) to complex orchestrations with multiple nodes, external tools, controls and automatic evaluations.

A critical feature is the centralized repository of flowswhich acts as a corporate library. Instead of each team having their prompts in separate documents or their own repositories, they are consolidated into a single managed repository, with clear branches, revisions, and histories.

In addition, the platform adds variant and hyperparameter experimentation capabilities: It is possible to test different combinations of prompts, models, temperature settings, or security policies in multiple nodes of the flow and compare results with clear metrics.

Regarding deployment, GenAIOps with notification flow It generates Docker images that encapsulate both the workflow and the process session.These are ready to run in environments such as Azure App Services, Kubernetes, or managed processes. From this foundation, A/B deployments are enabled to compare flow versions in real-world environments.

Another strength is the management of relationships between datasets and flows. Each evaluation flow can work with multiple standard and test datasetsThis allows for validating behaviors in different scenarios before putting something in the hands of end users.

The platform also automatically registers new versions of datasets and flows only when there are actual changes, and It generates comprehensive reports in formats such as CSV and HTML. to support decisions based on data, not intuition.

The four phases of GenAIOps with notification flow

The GenAIOps approach breaks down the life cycle into four clearly differentiated stages, which help to avoid the typical chaos of "we try things with AI and see what happens".

The first phase, initialization, focuses on Define the business objective precisely and gather representative data examplesHere the basic structure of the prompt flow is outlined and the architecture is designed, which will then be refined.

In the experimentation phase, the flow is applied to that sample data and Different variants of prompts, models, and configurations are evaluated.The process is relentlessly iterated until an acceptable combination is found that meets minimum quality and consistency standards.

Next comes the evaluation and refinement phase, where Larger and more varied datasets are used to conduct rigorous comparative testsOnly when the flow demonstrates consistent performance aligned with the defined standards is it considered ready for the next step.

Finally, in the implementation phase, the flow is optimized to make it efficient and deployed in production. including A/B deployment options, monitoring, user feedback collection, and continuous improvement cyclesNothing is set in stone: the flow continues to be adjusted based on what is observed in real use.

This methodology is packaged in a GenAIOps repository template, with code-first, pre-built pipelines, and Local and cloud-based execution tools for developing, evaluating, and deploying LLM-based applications without reinventing the wheel in each project.

Integration with Azure DevOps: repositories, pipelines, and authentication

To bring GenAIOps from theory to a real organization, integrating it with Azure DevOps is key. The typical template starts with a repository in Azure Repos with two main branches, main and development, which reflect different environments and code promotion strategies.

The sample repository is cloned from GitHub, associated with Azure Repos, and We usually work by creating feature branches from development.Changes are sent via pull requests, which automatically trigger validation and experimentation pipelines.

In order for Azure DevOps to interact with Azure Machine Learning and other services, it is configured a service entity in Azure as a technical identityThis identity is used in an Azure DevOps service connection, so pipelines are authenticated without exposing keys in plain text.

Typically, this entity has Owner permissions on the ML subscription or working resource, so that Pipelines can provision endpoints, register models, and update policies in key storesIf you want to strengthen security, you can adjust the role to Contributor by adapting the YAML steps that handle permissions.

Additionally, a group of variables is created in Azure DevOps that It stores sensitive data such as the service connection name or resource identifiers.These variables are exposed as an environment to the pipelines, avoiding hardcoding critical information in the code.

Configuring local and remote repositories allows you to The development branch is protected with branch policies that require a pull request pipeline to be executed before allowing the merge. This pipeline handles build validations and experimentation flows, preventing broken changes from being introduced.

Once the code enters development, a dev pipeline is triggered that It includes complete phases of CI and CD: running experiments and evaluations, recording flows in the Azure ML model registry, deploying endpoints and smoke tests, and integrating on newly created endpoints.

The same pattern is replicated across a version or release branch, connected to production environments. There, CI/CD pipelines for production repeat the cycle of experimentation, evaluation, and deploymentbut on infrastructure and production level data, with greater control and additional manual reviews if necessary.

A key detail is the "human loop review" included in these pipelines: After the CI phase, the CD remains locked until a person manually approves it. The continuation is from the Azure Pipelines interface. If it is not approved within a certain time (for example, 60 minutes), the execution is rejected.

Local implementation and connection with LLM providers

Not everything revolves around pipelines: GenAIOps also supports local execution for rapid experimentationYou can clone the template repository, create a .env file in the root directory, and define the connections to Azure OpenAI or other compatible endpoints within it.

These connections include parameters such as api_key, api_base, api_type, and api_version, and They are referenced by name within the flows (for example, a connection called "aoai" with a specific API version). In this way, the same flow can be executed locally and in the cloud without changes to the code.

To use this mode, simply create a virtual environment or conda and install the necessary dependencies (promptflow, promptflow-tools, promptflow-sdk, openai, jinja2, python-dotenv, etc.). From there, you can write test scripts in a local execution folder and run experiments on the defined flows.

This cloud/on-premises duality meshes very well with a mature DevOps mindset: It is tested on a small scale locally, formally validated in pipelines, and then promoted to higher-level environments with controls and auditing.Everything is versioned in Git and connected to Azure DevOps.

Typical tools in a DevOps ecosystem with AI and LLMOps

Beyond Azure's specific offering, a modern DevOps ecosystem with AI and LLMOps typically relies on a set of tools covering ChatOps, model orchestration, monitoring, and observability.

In the ChatOps layer, it is common to combine Slack with bots like HubotMicrosoft Teams with agents based on Power Virtual Agents, or Discord along with frameworks like Botpress or Rasa to build custom assistants that connect with pipelines, monitoring systems, and internal services.

In the LLMOps/MLOps plane, they are frequent platforms like Kubeflow and MLflow to manage pipelines, model records and experiments, as well as specific tools such as Weights & Biases (W&B) for advanced metric tracking, run comparisons or in-depth visualizations.

For building applications on LLM, it is common to use frameworks like LangChain or OpenLLM-type librariesThese solutions facilitate the assembly of prompt chains, connectors to external data, tools, and multi-step agents. Simultaneously, solutions for LLM-specific observability are emerging, enabling the monitoring of prompts, responses, costs, and quality.

In integration with classic DevOps, tools like Jenkins or GitLab CI remain relevant for the CI/CD part, Kubernetes and ArgoCD for continuous cloud-native deploymentand observability stacks like Prometheus, Grafana, and Loki for metrics, dashboards, and logs.

Challenges, limitations and progressive adoption

All this deployment of practices and tools doesn't come for free. The complexity of managing prompts, model versions, and flow variants is considerable, especially when multiple teams work at the same time —a scenario where it is advisable to apply strategies like GitOps to coordinate changes and deployments.

In addition, ChatOps bots and the LLMs themselves with the capacity for action They introduce considerable security risks if they have excessive permissions in production environments or if data exposure surfaces are not properly controlled.

Added to this is the dependence on open-source models with sensitive licenses or commercial APIs which can change conditions, prices, or limits. And, to make matters worse, robust evaluation of LLMs in production remains an open area, with many questions still unanswered.

Therefore, it makes sense to address the adoption of LLMOps and ChatOps within DevOps in a progressive and controlled manner, starting by automating repetitive tasks with simple bots (reboots, log queries, build tagging, etc.).

Later, they can be introduced LLM for support tasks, incident classification, or debugging assistanceFor example, by explaining errors based on logs or proposing mitigations based on internal documentation.

Once the classic ML operation is stabilized, it's time to address LLMOps with specialized language models for domains such as customer service, DevSecOps or QA, taking advantage of everything learned in previous phases.

The horizon towards which all these practices point is a conversational, predictive, and increasingly autonomous engineering environmentwhere much of the development and operation is expressed in natural language and AI helps to make proactive decisions about deployments, scaling or rollbacks.

With this puzzle in place—DevOps, ChatOps, MLOps, GenAIOps, and LLMOps—organizations have a solid framework for building and sustaining LLM-based systems that truly deliver valueMaintaining control over quality, costs, safety, and alignment with the business, instead of remaining with simple prototypes or isolated tests that fall apart as soon as they reach production.