Cybersecurity in smart buildings: risks, challenges and key factors

Informatec Digital » Resources » Cybersecurity in smart buildings: risks, challenges and keys

Cybersecurity in smart buildings has become a top priority: buildings are no longer just concrete, steel, and glass, but veritable technological platforms connected to the internet, filled with IoT devices, sensors, access control systems, and networks that manage everything from climate control to elevators. All this infrastructure offers convenience and efficiency, but it also opens the door to new risks if not properly protected.

In parallel, the expansion of the Internet of Things and remote work has dramatically increased the attack surface: tenant, employee, and company data circulates between homes, offices, and public clouds, while building management systems (BMS) and OT networks are increasingly connected to corporate IT networks. Understanding this new scenario and implementing robust protection measures is no longer optional; it is the only way to ensure that a smart building is truly “smart” and not the weak link in the chain.

Smart buildings, IoT and data: why cybersecurity is critical

So-called smart buildings, or connected buildings , are structures that integrate a multitude of systems under a single network infrastructure: heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), lighting, alarms, security, access control, elevators, video surveillance systems, energy management platforms, and much more. All of this is orchestrated through software that collects, processes, and analyzes large volumes of data.

The foundation of this model is the Internet of Things (IoT) . According to Statista forecasts, the number of connected IoT devices worldwide will approach 29.000 billion by 2030. Thermostats, actuators and presence sensors, energy meters, smart locks, IP cameras, card readers, and IP video intercoms are all part of this ecosystem that allows for building automation to improve security, sustainability, energy efficiency, and accessibility.

In a smart building, highly sensitive data about user behavior is generated and manipulated : energy consumption patterns, access times, movement between zones, use of common areas, presence or absence in apartments or offices, etc. Analyzing user behavior is not only key to optimizing the building's operation, but if it falls into the wrong hands, it can compromise the privacy of tenants and companies, and even facilitate physical crimes (knowing when a unit or office is empty, for example).

For this reason, the infrastructure that stores, processes and transports this data (servers, clouds, internal networks , IoT gateways, BMS, management applications) must be robust, properly segmented and have adequate cybersecurity protocols: encryption of communications, strong authentication, monitoring, vulnerability management and an incident response plan, among others.

Furthermore, with the convergence of IT (information) and OT (operational) networks , any breach in a building control system can impact not only the building's services but also the corporate network of the company that occupies or manages it. It is, therefore, a problem that affects the building owner, tenants, and service providers alike.

A brief evolution of smart buildings and their control systems

The first steps towards modern smart buildings were taken between the 1970s and 1980s, with primitive building automation systems, whose focus was on managing energy consumption and ensuring acceptable comfort inside (temperature, ventilation, basic lighting, etc.). These were relatively closed systems, with little connection to the outside world and without significant data analysis capabilities.

It was in the late 90s and early 2000s that the arrival of the internet and information technologies changed the landscape: building management systems began to connect to IP networks, real-time monitoring tools emerged, remote maintenance options were incorporated, and their integration with other digital services began. This is when the current concept of a truly “smart” building began to take shape.

With the advancement of technology, Building Management Systems (BMS) have transformed into complex platforms that unify multiple subsystems and share elements such as databases, alarm consoles, and climate control, lighting, and security tools. Protocols like BACnet (HVAC), DALI (lighting), and general standards such as KNX, LonWorks, and Modbus have facilitated interoperability between devices from different manufacturers.

The problem is that many of these "classic" protocols weren't designed with security in mind . They emerged in an era where availability and ease of connection were priorities, not encryption or authentication. While improvements have been introduced over time (encryption, authentication mechanisms, etc.), installations based on older versions, lacking hardening and adequate protection, still exist today.

In the current context, the choice of communication protocol and the way it is protected (firewalls, user control, VPN for remote access, network segmentation, password policies, equipment hardening and control of exposed information) is a critical factor for the cybersecurity of any smart building.

Expectations of residents and businesses in a smart building

Those who move into a high-end smart building don't just expect a modern space; they want a comfortable, seamless, and secure daily experience. Residents and users rely on features like climate control, advanced lighting, entertainment solutions, space booking, and access control to operate almost invisibly and with exceptional ease.

In this context, physical and digital security carries enormous weight. It is taken for granted that the building includes advanced surveillance systems, alarms, intrusion detection, premium access control, and, increasingly, artificial intelligence-based functions to detect anomalies in the behavior of devices or users. Added to this are privacy and regulatory compliance requirements (such as the GDPR in Europe).

Sustainability and energy efficiency are also part of the expectations: solar panels, rainwater harvesting, low-consumption appliances, smart climate control and lighting management, optimized maintenance to reduce unnecessary trips, etc. Cybersecurity must fit with this approach: it's pointless to have a "green" building if its systems are vulnerable to attacks that could take it offline.

Therefore, any smart building project must balance comfort, security, and sustainability , integrating access control, home automation platforms, and management systems in a homogeneous and secure manner, without creating holes through which an attacker can slip in.

Cybersecurity, data processing and secure communications in smart buildings

One of the keys to protecting a smart building is treating the data generated by devices and users as a critical asset. We're not just talking about technical logs; this is information that describes how the building is used, what consumption patterns exist, who enters or leaves and at what time, which areas are visited most frequently, and so on.

A single building can house data of very different natures : maintenance information, parameters of critical equipment, tenants' personal data (parking spaces, authorized access, credentials), video surveillance records, incident logs, and more. All these elements must be classified according to their criticality and subjected to appropriate protection measures (encryption in transit and at rest, access controls, anonymization where possible).

Communication between devices and systems is carried out using connectivity technologies such as Wi-Fi , Bluetooth, RFID, LTE, and other wired or wireless networks. Network and application protocols are built upon these, some general (HTTPS, MQTT/MQTTS for IoT) and others specific to the sector (LonTalk, Modbus/TCP, BACnet, KNX, etc.). Depending on the type of service and the associated risk, it will be necessary to harden each layer with specific measures.

In the cloud and external services sector, providers must offer robust security mechanisms : strong authentication, end-to-end encryption, proper key management, data segregation between clients, audit logs, and business continuity plans. Otherwise, a cloud failure could simultaneously affect multiple buildings or clients.

A recommended approach is to apply the "zero trust" principle to networks and services : do not trust any device or user by default, continuously verify identities, segment networks based on roles and criticality, strictly limit privileges, and periodically review who has access to which resources.

Identity and IoT device management in the building

Identity and access management (IAM) is no longer exclusive to large corporations; smart buildings also need to manage digital identities for people and devices. Every IoT device that connects to the building's network must be properly authenticated and authorized.

A best practice is to assign each IoT device a unique and robust identifier , linked to the building and its specific function. From there, it's necessary to manage the device's entire lifecycle: registration, secure initial configuration, firmware maintenance, change control, and revocation or decommissioning when it's no longer in use or is replaced.

In parallel, it's essential to closely monitor the network connections of all users and providers accessing the building's systems: maintenance technicians, security companies, cleaning companies using management platforms, administrative staff, tenants with control panels, etc. Not everyone needs the same level of privileges or access to the same areas or data.

Combining good network segmentation with role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC) policies, along with multi-factor authentication for sensitive access, greatly reduces the chances of an attacker exploiting a stolen credential or compromised device to move laterally through the infrastructure.

Maintenance, updates and digital twins

One of the most common cybersecurity mistakes is installing systems and neglecting their maintenance . In a smart building, this can be especially dangerous: unupdated IoT devices, control systems with outdated firmware, or unpatched servers become open doors for attackers.

To minimize risks, it is essential to establish a program of regular software and firmware updates , schedule security reviews, and perform vulnerability scans and penetration tests on the building's critical systems. All of this must be done in a planned manner, avoiding unnecessary disruptions but without postponing important patches.

In recent years, so-called digital twins of buildings have gained traction : virtual models that represent in detail the state of the building, its systems, and its behavior. These digital models are fed by real-time data and allow for the simulation of changes, the detection of anomalies, and the anticipation of failures before they occur in the physical world. A well-implemented digital twin also facilitates the testing of security measures in a controlled environment.

From a cybersecurity perspective, a well-implemented digital twin can help test security configurations and measures in a controlled environment, assess the impact of a potential attack, or study a building's resilience to incidents. It also facilitates continuous performance optimization and the early detection of anomalous behavior in equipment or networks.

Access control and key devices in building security

The access control system is one of the most visible components of cybersecurity in buildings because it acts as a bridge between the physical and digital worlds. Its function is not only to allow or deny entry through a door, but also to integrate with the overall security of the building and, in many cases, with home automation and other management platforms.

Today, the clear trend is toward IP-based access control systems , which are replacing older analog solutions. These devices can be easily integrated with video surveillance systems, centralized control platforms, and mobile applications, offering a modern and agile experience for both users and administrators.

High-end IP video intercoms incorporate Full HD cameras to visually verify who is calling, features such as adaptive face zoom for improved identification, and touchscreens capable of displaying personalized messages to residents or visitors. Furthermore, a modular design allows the equipment to be adapted to the needs of each project, from a single-family home to a large office building or residential complex. Many of these systems can be powered via PoE , simplifying wiring and installation.

Indoor video intercom monitors have also evolved: 7-inch touchscreens, tempered glass finishes, and a look that complements modern interiors. Beyond simply seeing who's at the door, they allow access to IP cameras distributed throughout the building (garages, hallways, courtyards) and the ability to send HTTP commands to other systems: turning on the air conditioning, changing the lighting, or calling the elevator, all from the same interface.

In common areas, multifunction access control readers provide flexible credentials: RFID cards, PIN keypads, fingerprint readers, and increasingly, mobile access via smartphone. Choosing devices that integrate the reader and controller into a single unit simplifies deployment and can reduce the attack surface if configured correctly.

Mobile access and digital credentials: convenience and risks

Mobile access control is becoming a standard in cutting-edge smart building projects. It allows users to open doors, barriers, or gates directly from their mobile phones, without needing physical keys or cards, and to manage visits or deliveries remotely.

From the user's point of view, mobile access offers unbeatable convenience : the phone becomes the master key, real-time notifications can be received, video intercom calls can be answered from outside the home, and in some cases, these functions can be integrated with other everyday applications.

In terms of security, when properly implemented, it can be more robust than traditional methods , as it relies on advanced encryption, device authentication, biometric protection of the smartphone itself, and the ability to immediately revoke credentials if the device is lost. However, it requires careful management: clear policies on what happens if a phone is stolen, if an employee leaves the company, or if a device is shared, as well as controls to prevent the use of rooted or malware-infected phones.

When planning a mobile access system in a smart building, it is advisable to analyze compatibility with the rest of the infrastructure , the user experience (especially with less technologically savvy tenants), regulatory compliance, and the privacy policy of the providers that manage the credentials in the cloud.

Specific cybersecurity risks in smart buildings

The more connected a building is, the more attractive it becomes to cybercriminals . Control systems (HVAC, lighting, elevators, IP cameras) or remote access to the building management system (BMS) can become entry points into the building's network or even connected corporate networks.

One of the most serious risks is the exposure of personal and usage data . Smart buildings collect large volumes of information about their occupants: access records, video surveillance images, consumption data, presence patterns, etc. Any breach in the protection of this data can violate the privacy of workers, visitors, and residents, and lead to significant penalties if data protection regulations are not met.

Another key attack vector is vulnerabilities in IoT devices . Many of these are designed with limited resources, deployed without proper security configuration, or not updated regularly. Default passwords, unnecessary open services, or outdated firmware are more common errors than you might think.

The networks that interconnect all these devices can also be a weak point if not properly secured. Connecting to a building network "just because it's already set up" without adding firewalls, segmentation, or access control is a recipe for trouble. OT networks focused solely on availability and speed, without confidentiality and integrity controls, amplify the impact of any incident.

Cyberattacks can result in significant financial losses : from ransomware that hijacks critical systems to service disruptions that force the closure of part of a building, as well as reputational damage and legal costs. Recent studies estimate that the average cost of a security breach is several million dollars, with a clear upward trend in recent years.

Cybersecurity and remote work: the building extends to the home

The acceleration of remote work and hybrid models has added an extra layer of complexity. Many companies have turned to videoconferencing platforms, cloud-based collaboration tools, and remote access to shared databases to maintain operations without teams being physically present in the office.

The problem is that, when working from home, employees often use personal devices or poorly secured home networks . This significantly increases the risk of malware, credential theft, or leaks of sensitive information, and this risk directly impacts the building's systems if the offices, servers, or building services are connected to these remote environments.

To strengthen the cybersecurity of a smart building in this context, both owners and tenants must rethink the security perimeter : the corporate network and building systems extend to the homes where people work. Securing the office router is no longer enough; the endpoint and home network must be considered part of the ecosystem that needs protection.

Key measures include the systematic use of VPNs and secure remote access , robust file sharing policies (controlling the use of email, public clouds and collaborative tools), periodic vulnerability assessments at remote workstations, and monitoring of suspicious access to servers or applications essential to the building's operation.

In addition, whenever a new tenant moves into a building or changes their way of working (for example, by adopting more teleworking), it is advisable to review the vulnerabilities of their workspace and coordinate security protocols between the building manager and the tenant company, so that everyone is rowing in the same direction.

Cybersecurity culture and user training

However sophisticated the technology, without a cybersecurity culture among all stakeholders, the risk remains high. Owners, building managers, tenants, employees, suppliers, and visitors are all part of the security ecosystem, and their daily decisions can make the difference between a minor incident and a serious breach.

It is essential to promote what we might call "cyber education" for citizens : clearly explaining why credentials should not be shared, the importance of updating devices, how to identify phishing emails, what to do in the event of strange behavior from a building system, and who to report any suspicions to.

Corporate IT teams are typically very focused on the confidentiality and integrity of networks and information , while building operations teams prioritize availability and ease of remote access for maintenance providers. These two worlds need to meet and coordinate common strategies.

Without a clear, well-implemented, and communicated cybersecurity strategy , the most demanding tenants may seek alternatives in other buildings with better digital security guarantees. After all, nobody wants to establish their headquarters or residence in a place where they feel their data or comfort could be compromised by a cyberattack.

Towards a comprehensive cybersecurity program in buildings

Effective protection of a smart building is not achieved with a single product, but rather with a comprehensive cybersecurity program specifically tailored to the real estate sector and the unique characteristics of each property. This program should begin with a detailed assessment of the current situation.

A good starting point is to conduct a thorough audit and diagnosis of all networks, systems, and devices connected to the building (IT and OT), identifying vulnerabilities, prioritizing risks, and mapping the interdependencies between services. From there, a customized protection plan is designed, establishing responsibilities, deadlines, and specific measures.

Among the usual elements of a solid program are vulnerability assessments of operations and systems , correction of detected problems, implementation of advanced monitoring, detection and incident response solutions, and reinforcement of organizational policies and controls (access management, supplier standards, response procedures, etc.).

Continuous monitoring and regular reviews allow the program to be adapted to emerging threats and technologies. Cybersecurity is not static; it requires a constant effort of updating, testing, reviewing, and improving, closely aligned with the technological evolution of smart buildings themselves.

Smart buildings are already a key part of modern life, offering a highly attractive combination of comfort, efficiency, and sustainability. However, their true value is only realized when the technology that makes them smart is protected with robust cybersecurity measures , well-defined processes, and informed users; those who manage to integrate all these elements will be the ones who truly offer safe, reliable, and future-proof spaces.